Each week, the Task Force blog will feature a video relating to the global fight against corruption, tax evasion, and poverty.
This week, U.S. Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) introduced the Incorporation Transparency and Law Enforcement Assistance Act. The bill would require all U.S. corporations to disclose a real human being as the beneficial owner of the corporation. Ann Hollingshead wrote a great blog post about the bill earlier this week.
This week’s featured video shows an excellent discussion about beneficial ownership from the Task Force 2011 Conference in Paris, France. They discuss how a lack of disclosed beneficial ownership protects corrupt dictators and tax dodgers from law enforcement scrutiny, why legitimate businesses will not be hurt by the requirement, and implications for international development.
The panel is chaired by Anthea Lawson of Global Witness, and includes Raymond Baker, Director of the Task Force and Global Financial Integrity and Jean Pesme, Coordinator of the Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative (StAR) at the World Bank.
The video is a valuable tool for anyone who wants or needs to know more about how illicit money is moved around the globe. It runs for 1 hour.
Take firm stand on AFSPA: Advani tells Center
Greater Kashmir, November 16, 2011
European Union stumbles to Busan. Foreign Affairs Council agrees common EU position
EURODAD, November 16, 2011
Ten means to put an end to black money issue
The Economic Times, November 17, 2011
Tax evasion pressure maintained on Switzerland
Swiss Info, November 16, 2011
Greece has 60 billion euros in unpaid taxes: EU report
Reuters, November 17, 2011
Imagine for a moment that airline security were left up to individual states, rather than the federal government. It’s perhaps not too much of a stretch of the imagination to conclude that different states would adopt different levels of security. For example, some states might require their passengers to provide identification to ensure they aren’t terrorists and pass their bags through x-ray machines to ensure those passengers aren’t trying to load illicit materials onto the airplane. Other states, though, might think it’s advantageous to reduce their security requirements. They might argue that by reducing screening, they could trim down wait times and attract more passengers into their airport. They might argue this would create more jobs and incomes within their state.
Do you see the problem with this? Of course by reducing security, those states would also attract another kind of crowd. The criminal kind. Terrorists would take advantage of these weak screening procedures. One state’s security gap would open the entire country to risk.
We would never allow it to happen in aviation. So why do we allow it to happen in banking?
As AFP reported late yesterday:
Europe’s top court barred Britain on Tuesday from enacting a corporate tax reform in its tiny territory of Gibraltar, ruling the scheme would amount to illegal state aid for offshore companies.
The European Union Court of Justice found that the proposed tax system was “designed in such a way that offshore companies avoid taxation,” making it “incompatible with the internal market” rules.
The ruling was a victory for the European Commission, which had stated in 2004 that the proposed system was incompatible with EU rules and would give companies in Gibraltar a lower rate than those taxed in Britain.
Human Trafficking is World’s 2nd Most Profitable Crime: Report
In Sight Crime, November 15, 2011
Unvarying Advani rolls in, Punjab too proccupied to notice
Express India, November 16, 2011
C.Suisse ends oldest Swiss bank brand Leu
Reuters, November 15, 2011
In Indonesia, Anger Against Mining Giant Grows
NPR, November 16, 2011
Dookeran hits out at Sarkozy
Stabroek News, November 15, 2011
Publish What You Fund, one of the Task Force’s Allied Organizations, has released their 2011 Pilot Aid Transparency Index. The index is relatively unique in that it looks at the donors, rather than the recipients, of aid, and ranks them by how transparent their giving process is. In all, they ranked 58 countries and institutions who collectively give billions of dollars of aid to the developing world.
Among the best performers were the World Bank International Development Association, Millenium Challenge Corporation and the governments of Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands. Among the worst performers were not only U.S. Departments of Treasury and Defense and China, but also surprising donors like the governments of Spain and Portugal.
Transparency in aid giving is enormously important in order to hold stakeholders accountable and make sure that aid money actually helps people in need. Countries who are spending large (if not large enough) sums of money attempting to help boost up the world’s poorest peoples should not be actively undermining their own efforts by promoting an opaque system of aid giving. Unfortunately, Publish What You Fund came to the following conclusions:
Baba Ramdev steps up pressure on government to enforce strong anti-graft laws
Newstrack India, November 13, 2011
Global Witness Welcomes Moves To Stop Corrupt Politicians And Criminals From Hiding Behind Anonymous U.S. Shell Companies
Global Witness, November 15, 2011
Govt may allow Nepalis to invest abroad
iStockAnalyst, November 14, 2011
Credit Suisse to reveal details of super-rich US ‘tax evaders’
The Guardian, November 14, 2011
What obstacles are preventing black money retrieval by the government
The Economic Times, November 15, 2011
This article is cross-posted at Triplecrisis.com. Click on ‘Continue Reading’ to download ChristianAid’s G20 Scorecard on taxes and development.
Back in September I was sitting in the salubrious office of an official from one of International Financial Institutions – when he slouched back in his chair, sighed and said ‘I can’t even bear to read those G20 communiqués – they are so vacuous.’ That evening, I found myself at a dinner hosted by DC law firm Jones Day where former Mexican President Zedillo branded the G20 ‘a disappointment.’
But last week Christian Aid welcomed the G20′s bold pronouncements on tax havens, financial transparency and development. President Sarkozy went as far as to say that havens that didn’t comply would be excluded from the international community. A whole programme of work on tax and development was agreed.
This was a major coup for organisations like Christian Aid and the Tax Justice Network that just three years ago were struggling to garner political support for these issues.
But haven’t we been here before? Back in 2009, the G20 declared ‘the era of banking secrecy is over.’ Yet this year the UK and Germany agreed to deals with Switzerland in lieu of tax from offshore account holders. Why didn’t the UK and Germany just get the information and pursue these individuals for what they owe? Banking secrecy, of course. It is alive and well. These deals, branded a disgrace by Christian Aid, were applauded by the Swiss bankers association for preserving their treasured ‘privacy’; read secrecy.
Every other week, the Task Force will be highlighting a Featured Allied Organization. The Task Force has 125 member organizations from all over the world which endorse its mission. Click here to access previous Featured Allied Organization posts. This week’s Featured Allied Organization is Pragati, Koraput.
Pragati, Koraput was established in January 1992 with the mission of improving the quality of life of tribal people and underprivileged sections of society living in remote pockets of Koraput district in Odisha, India. The tribal people in this region, due to their isolation, have been cut off from the mainstream of society and deprived of the basic amenities of life. Pragati, Koraput plans activities based on analysis of the socio-economic and political contexts of the area and community dynamics, with emphasis on community empowerment. Their programs seek equitable, peaceful, productive and inclusive relationships within communities, protection of the environment and a culture of participation to influence and shape their lives. Their programs are unique in that they involve Community Based Organizations in project planning, implementation, monitoring and management. To this end, Pragati, Koraput liaises with Panchayati Raj (local assemblies) and Government line departments, and networks with local, state and national NGOs and people’s organizations. Current programs include: civil society development, natural resource management, system of rice intensification, sustainable agriculture, women’s self help groups and cooperatives, disaster risk reduction, and community based rehabilitation for persons with disabilities.
The featured photograph was taken at the District Level Women’s Convention which took place in January 2011. To learn more about Pragati, Koraput and their programs please visit their webpage .
The Southern Times, November 14, 2011
The corruption risk for governance and business
livemint.com, November 12, 2011
Advani starts jan chenta yatra in Punjab on high note but loses sheen midway
The Times of India, November 13, 2011
Credit Suisse released 130 US client files: report
AFP, November 14, 2011
Banking on not getting sanctioned
Now Lebanon, November 12, 2011
US SEC OKs tougher reverse merger listing rules
Reuters, November 9, 2011
Siemens Charged With Bribery In Turkey
The Wall Street Journal (blog), November 10, 2011
EU Transparency rules: needed in all sectors
EURODAD, November 10, 2011
Swiss May Discipline Four Banks For Poor Due Diligence
The Wall Street Journal (blog), November 10, 2011
G20 action on tax and development: A progress report card
EURODAD, November 9, 2011
This entire blog post is devoted to three sentences that came out of Senator John McCain’s mouth on Tuesday. “A whole blog post for three sentences?” You might ask. Well, yes. Those sentences were just that shocking. But before I get down to exactly what Mr. McCain said here’s a little background.
In 2004 Congress passed the Homeland Investment Act, which provided a one-time tax holiday for the U.S. multinationals to repatriate foreign earnings. Normally, when companies bring back profits that are earned abroad, they are taxed at the standard 35% corporate tax rate. The Act allowed those companies to bring back their profits—one time only—at a 5% rate. The legislation even specified that the funds should be “earmarked for activities like hiring workers or conducting research” to prevent the companies from using the money for executive compensation or buying back stock.” Proponents argued the funds would generate jobs and other economic activity as companies took advantage of the tax break and brought dollars back to American soil.
It didn’t work.
September 25, 2014·
Owners of anonymous companies registered in U.S. states are ripping off innocent people and businesses across America, says a new report by ...
September 21, 2014·
WASHINGTON, D.C.—The G20’s recent focus on financial transparency is a welcome development, but instituting bare minimum requirements, or plans that allow for ...
September 16, 2014·
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) new recommendations to fight multinational corporate tax avoidance look robust from ...